Contracting Authority: European Commission
EU-Canada Youth Transatlantic Civil Society Dialogues
Guidelines for grant applicants
19.050100 - Partnership Instrument

Reference:
EuropeAid/159496/DD/ACT/CA
Deadline for submission of full application:
10 July 2018 at 16:00h. (Brussels date and time)
(in order to convert to local time click here)
NOTICE
This is an open call for proposals, where all documents are submitted together (concept note – Annex A.1 – and full application form – Annex A.2). In the first instance, only the concept notes will be evaluated. Thereafter, for the applicants who have been pre-selected, the full proposal will be evaluated. After the evaluation of the full proposals, an eligibility check will be performed for those which have been provisionally selected. Eligibility will be checked on the basis of the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority and the signed ‘declaration by the lead applicant’ sent together with the application.
Online submission via PROSPECT
To apply to this call for proposals, organisations must register in PADOR and submit their application in PROSPECT (see section 2.2.2 of the guidelines). The aim of PROSPECT is to increase the efficiency of the management of the call for proposals and to offer a better service to civil society organisations through a new panel of functionalities such as the on-line submission and the possibility to follow up online the status of their application.
Preparation: Information session 25 April 2018 and user manuals. 
Should you be interested in this session, please send an email by 20 April 2018 to delegation-canada-pi@eeas.europa.eu, indicating: name, surname, nationality and email address of the persons who are going to participate as well as their organisation (max. two participants per organisation). No costs incurred by the applicants for attending this information session are reimbursable.
All organisations can find the e-learning (Annex L) and the PROSPECT users' manual (Annex M) and the FAQ published together with the documents of this call. You may also contact our technical support team via the online support form in PROSPECT.

Table of contents
1	EU-Canada Youth Transatlantic Civil Society Dialogues
1.1	Background
1.2	Objectives of the programme and priority issues
1.3	Financial allocation provided by the contracting authority
2	Rules FOR thIS call for proposalS
2.1	Eligibility criteria
2.1.1	Eligibility of applicants (i.e. lead applicant and co-applicant(s))
2.1.2	Affiliated entities
2.1.3	Associates and Contractors
2.1.4	Eligible actions: actions for which an application may be made
2.1.5	Eligibility of costs: costs that can be included
2.2	How to apply and the procedures to follow
2.2.1	Application forms
2.2.2	Where and how to send applications
2.2.3	Deadline for submission of applications
2.2.4	Further information about applications
2.3	Evaluation and selection of applications
2.4	Submission of supporting documents for provisionally selected applications
2.5	Notification of the Contracting Authority’s decision
2.5.1	Content of the decision
2.5.2	Indicative timetable
2.6	Conditions for implementation after the Contracting Authority’s decision to award a grant
2.7	Early detection and exclusion system (edes)
3	LIST OF annexes

1	EU-Canada Youth Transatlantic Civil Society Dialogues
1.1	Background
The Partnership Instrument (PI) was specifically designed to promote the European Union (EU)'s strategic interests worldwide by supporting cooperation on areas of mutual interest with major international actors. More in detail, it encompasses four key areas: a) it addresses major global challenges such as energy security, climate change and environmental protection; b) it supports the implementation of the external dimension of EU internal policies and of the Europe 2020 Strategy; c) it covers specific aspects of the EU’s economic diplomacy by improving access to third-countries' markets through trade, investment and business opportunities, and d) it supports public diplomacy activities, including academic and think tank cooperation as well as outreach activities to promote the Union’s vision and principles.
Priority interventions that may be supported by the Partnership Instrument have been laid out in the following legal basis and policy documents:
– Regulation (EU) N°236/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 laying down common rules and procedures for the implementation of the Union's 	instruments for financing external action in particular Article 2 thereof,
– Regulation (EU, Euratom) N° 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and 	repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) N°1605/2002, and in particular Article 84(2) 	thereof,
– Regulation (EU) No 234/2014 of 11 March 2014 establishing a Partnership Instrument for cooperation with third countries;
– Commission Implementing Decision C(2014)4453 of 3 July 2014 on the adoption of the first multiannual indicative programme for the period 2014-2017 under the Partnership Instrument for cooperation with third countries;
– The Commission implementing Decision C(2014)7423 of 16 October 2014 adopting the 2014 Annual Action Programme.
The EU and Canada opened a new stronger chapter in their longstanding cooperation with the Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) which entered into provisional application on 1 April 2017. The goal of SPA is to provide an evergreen framework for political and sectorial cooperation alongside the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).

The long-standing friendship forged between the people of Europe and Canada through their extensive historical, cultural, political and economic links lies at the heart of the partnership. Transatlantic ties exist at all levels of government and society and the impact of this relationship is significant across Canadian and European societies.  In Article 16, SPA encourages these ties and new ways to foster relationships through people-to-people contacts. 

Notably SPA encourages the use of exchanges through non-governmental organisations and think-tanks that bring together youth and other economic and social partners to expand and deepen these relations and enrich the flow of ideas for the solution of common challenges.

To contribute to the attainment of this objective the current call for proposals proposes the establishment of EU – Canada Youth dialogues aiming to providing a platform where relevant youth and youth-related organisations can meet to exchange views and experiences on matters of concern and interest to young people coming from the European Union and Canada. 

Involvement of young people in policy shaping is a priority for both the EU and Canada.  

At the EU level, while respecting Member States have the overall responsibility for youth policy, the EU Youth Strategy, agreed by EU Ministers, sets out a framework for cooperation covering the years 2010-2018.  It has two main objectives: a) To provide more and equal opportunities for young people in education and the job market and b) To encourage young people to actively participate in society.

In recognition of the importance of youth policy, Canada's Prime Minister is also Minister of Youth.  To assist his role as such, PM Trudeau created an advisory board composed of 30 Canadian youth aged 16 to 24.  Members advise the Prime Minister on education, economy, climate change and other issues affecting youth.

Under Strand 3 of the Partnership Instrument 2017 Annual Action Programme Action on Public and Cultural Diplomacy, 'Civil Society Engagement', €900,000 has been set aside for an action on EU-Canada Civil Society Dialogues.
1.2	Objectives of the programme and priority issues 
The global objective of this call for proposals (CfP) is to foster mutual understanding between the EU and Canada by strengthening relationships through people to people contacts and by engaging civil society organizations (CSO) in exchanges to expand and deepen relations and enrich the flow of ideas for the solution of common challenges. These dialogues will complement the formal policy dialogue between the EU and Canada.
The specific objective of this call for proposals is to support young people on both sides of the Atlantic in being more involved in bilateral policy processes by promoting cooperation between Canadian and European youth organizations, associations and networks engaged in areas of common interest.
In order to complement PI-funded activities implemented by universities and research centers, the objective of actions funded under this call should not be purely of academic nature but involve wider audiences.
Actions to be funded under this CfP will have to meaningfully mainstream gender, societal resilience and inclusion and will have to provide innovative approaches.
These actions will have, through social media or other innovative approaches, to reach out to a broader public than the direct beneficiaries allowing a wider consultation and engagement process.
Moreover, actions to be funded under this CfP will have to address only one of the following thematic priorities:

1.	Lot 1: Thematic priority one: youth, security and peace

In line with UN Security Council Resolution 2250 (2015) youth is considered a positive force for conflict prevention and sustaining peace, that has to be empowered. The overall objective of the EU-Canada Civil Society Dialogues would be cross-regional trust-building between Civil Society Organisations. 

Under this overarching topic, dialogue could focus on three sub-topics:

a) Preventing and countering violent extremism: Discussions could be centred on how to build peaceful, inclusive societies and protect and support young people to strengthen their resilience in the face of violent extremism.  Discussion could also explore how to shape our societies so that people can thrive, and no one is left behind.  In other words, how to ensure societies that provide opportunities for all.  

b) Climate change: Discussion of the impacts of climate change (e.g. on water, food and energy security; as a factor for increased migration pressures, exacerbation of conflicts and endangerment of cultural heritage; and on societal resilience as a whole) could contribute to an understanding of the challenges that apply specifically to young people around the world.

c) Gender equality: Young people are in a critical position to contribute to a transformation towards a world where societies are free of gender-based discrimination. Young men and women need to be empowered to unlock their potential.

Possible deliverables include creating a network/platform/common project database for peer to peer contact, enabling the sharing of ideas and best practices amongst the relevant stakeholders.

2.	Lot 2: Thematic priority two: digital world

The EU cybersecurity strategy, adopted in 2013 and reviewed in 2017, outlines the principles that guide the EU action in improving online security, trust and inclusion - for example the importance of access to the internet, and the protection of fundamental rights online. 

Europe's e-Inclusion policy ensures that no one is left behind and promotes the use of ICTs to overcome exclusion, and improve employment opportunities, quality of life, social participation and cohesion. Digitalisation and technological change will also have a major impact on the world of work, notably as regards work organisation and skills needs.  Digital inclusion is also a current priority for Canada.

Youth entrepreneurs from the EU and Canada could be invited to participate in this conversation.    
The Youth Dialogue under this point would aim to bring EU and Canadian Youth organisations together, to discuss the advantages of an inclusive digital society which benefits from digitalisation, but also examine the negative aspects of digital economy and the online world in general, such as hate speech (where divisive dialogue can lead to human rights abuses and exclusion), media literacy and improvement of responsibility online.
1.3	Financial allocation provided by the contracting authority
The overall indicative amount made available under this call for proposals is EUR 900 000. The Contracting Authority reserves the right not to award all available funds.
Indicative allocation of funds by lot:
Lot 1 - youth, security and peace: EUR 450 000
Lot 2 - digital world: EUR 450 000
If the allocation indicated for a specific lot cannot be used due to insufficient quality or number of proposals received, the Contracting Authority reserves the right to reallocate the remaining funds to another lot.
Size of grants
Any grant requested under this call for proposals, under Lot 1 or Lot 2, must fall between the following minimum and maximum amounts:
• Minimum amount: EUR 150 000
• Maximum amount: EUR 450 000
Any grant requested under this call for proposals must fall between the following minimum maximum percentages of total eligible costs of the action:
•	Minimum percentage: 55 % of the total eligible costs of the action.
•	Maximum percentage: 80% of the total eligible costs of the action (see also section 2.1.5).
The balance (i.e. the difference between the total cost of the action and the amount requested from the Contracting Authority) must be financed from sources other than the European Union Budget or the European Development Fund.
2	
Rules FOR thIS call for proposalS
These guidelines set out the rules for the submission, selection and implementation of the actions financed under this call, in conformity with the Practical Guide, which is applicable to the present call (available at http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/prag/document.do?locale=en) .
2.1	Eligibility criteria
There are three sets of eligibility criteria, relating to:
(1)	the actors:
•	The lead applicant, i.e. the entity submitting the concept note and the full application form (2.1.1),
•	if any, its co-applicant(s) (where it is not specified otherwise the lead applicant and its co-applicant(s) are hereinafter jointly referred as the "applicants") (2.1.1), 
•	and, if any, affiliated entity(ies) to the lead applicant and/or to a co-applicant(s). (2.1.2);
(2)	the actions:
•	Actions for which a grant may be awarded (2.1.4);
(3)	the costs:
•	types of cost that may be taken into account in setting the amount of the grant (2.1.5).
2.1.1	Eligibility of applicants (i.e. lead applicant and co-applicant(s))
Lead applicant
(1)	In order to be eligible for a grant, the lead applicant must:
•	be a legal person and 
•	be non-profit-making and
•	be a specific type of organization such as: non-governmental organization, public sector operator, local authority, university, think tank, international (inter-governmental) organization as defined by Article 43 of the Rules of application of the EU Financial Regulation. and
•	be established in a Member State of the European Union or in Canada
For British applicants: Please be aware that eligibility criteria must be complied with for the entire duration of the grant. If the United Kingdom withdraws from the EU during the grant period without concluding an agreement with the EU ensuring in particular that British applicants continue to be eligible, you will cease to receive EU funding (while continuing, where possible to participate) or be required to leave the project on the basis of Article 12.2 of the General Conditions to the grant agreement.
This obligation does not apply to international organisations and
•	be directly responsible for the preparation and management of the action with the co-applicant(s) and affiliated entity(ies), not acting as an intermediary.
 (2)	Potential applicants may not participate in calls for proposals or be awarded grants if they are in any of the situations listed in section 2.3.3 of the Practical Guide;

In Annex A.2, section 5 (‘declaration by the lead applicant’), the lead applicant must declare that the lead applicant himself, the co-applicant(s) and affiliated entity(ies) are not in any of these situations.
The lead applicant must act with co-applicant(s) as specified hereafter.
If awarded the grant contract, the lead applicant will become the beneficiary identified as the Coordinator in Annex E3h1 (Special Conditions). The Coordinator is the main interlocutor of the Contracting Authority. It represents and acts on behalf of any other co-beneficiary (if any) and coordinate the design and implementation of the action.
Co-applicant(s)
Applications have to involve at least one EU and one Canadian organization. It is recommended that a maximum three co-applicants be involved in the action.
Co-applicants participate in designing and implementing the action, and the costs they incur are eligible in the same way as those incurred by the lead applicant. 
Co-applicants must satisfy the eligibility criteria as applicable to the lead applicant.
In addition to the categories referred to in section 2.1.1, the following are however also eligible: consortia and networks of organizations listed in the above mentioned section.
Co-applicants must sign the mandate in Annex A.2., section 4.
If awarded the grant contract, the co-applicant(s) will become beneficiary(ies) in the action (together with the Coordinator). 
2.1.2	Affiliated entities
The lead applicant and its co-applicant(s) may act with affiliated entity(ies).
Only the following entities may be considered as affiliated entities to the lead applicant and/or to co-applicant(s):
Only entities having a structural link with the applicants (i.e. the lead applicant or a co-applicant), in particular a legal or capital link.
This structural link encompasses mainly two notions:
(i) 	Control, as defined in Directive 2013/34/EU on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings:
Entities affiliated to applicant may hence be:
-	Entities directly or indirectly controlled by an applicant (daughter companies or first-tier subsidiaries). They may also be entities controlled by an entity controlled by an applicant (granddaughter companies or second-tier subsidiaries) and the same applies to further tiers of control;
-	Entities directly or indirectly controlling the  applicant (parent companies). Likewise, they may be entities controlling an entity controlling the applicant;
-	Entities under the same direct or indirect control as the applicant (sister companies).
(ii) 	Membership, i.e. the applicant is legally defined as a e.g. network, federation, association in which the proposed affiliated entities also participate or  the applicant participates in the same entity (e.g. network, federation, association) as the proposed affiliated entities.

The structural link shall as a general rule be neither limited to the action nor established for the sole purpose of its implementation. This means that the link would exist independently of the award of the grant; it should exist before the call for proposals and remain valid after the end of the action.

By way of exception, an entity may be considered as affiliated to an applicant even if it has a structural link specifically established for the sole purpose of the implementation of the action in the case of so-called “sole applicants” or “sole beneficiaries”.  A sole applicant or a sole beneficiary is a legal entity formed by several entities (a group of entities) which together comply with the criteria for being awarded the grant. For example, an association is formed by its members.
	What is not an affiliated entity? 

The following are not considered entities affiliated to an applicant:

-	Entities that have entered into a (procurement) contract or subcontract with an applicant, act as concessionaires or delegatees for public services for an applicant,
-	Entities that receive financial support from an applicant,
-	Entities that cooperate on a regular basis with an applicant on the basis of a memorandum of understanding or share some assets,
-	Entities that have signed a consortium agreement under the grant contract (unless this consortium agreement leads to the creation of a "sole applicant" as described above).

How to verify the existence of the required link with an applicant?

The affiliation resulting from control may in particular be proved on the basis of the consolidated accounts of the group of entities the applicant and its proposed affiliates belong to.
The affiliation resulting from membership may in particular be proved on the basis of the statutes or equivalent act establishing the entity (network, federation, association) which the applicant constitutes or in which the applicant participates.
If the applicants are awarded a grant contract, their affiliated entity(ies) will not become beneficiary(ies) of the action and signatory(ies) of the grant contract. However, they will participate in the design and  in the implementation of the action and the costs they incur (including those incurred for implementation contracts and financial support to third parties) may be accepted as eligible costs, provided they comply with all the relevant rules already applicable to the beneficiary(ies) under the grant contract.
Affiliated entity(ies) must satisfy the same eligibility criteria as the lead applicant and the co-applicant(s).  They must sign the affiliated entity(ies) statement in Annex A.2., section 5.
2.1.3	Associates and Contractors
The following entities are not applicants nor affiliated entities and do not have to sign the "mandate for co-applicant(s)" or "affiliated entities' statement":
•	Associates
Other organisations or individuals may be involved in the action. Such associates play a real role in the action but may not receive funding from the grant, with the exception of per diem or travel costs. Associates do not have to meet the eligibility criteria referred to in section 2.1.1. Associates must be mentioned in Annex A.2., section 4 — ‘Associates participating in the action’.
•	Contractors
The beneficiaries and their affiliated entities are permitted to award contracts. Associates or affiliated entity(ies) cannot be also contractors in the project. Contractors are subject to the procurement rules set out in Annex IV to the standard grant contract.
2.1.4	Eligible actions: actions for which an application may be made
Definition
An action is composed of a set of activities.
Duration
The initial planned duration of an action may not be lower than 18 months nor exceed 30 months.
Sectors or themes
•	Promotion of cooperation between Canadian and European youth organizations, associations and networks engaged in areas of common interest is a central theme for all the lots;
•	youth, security and peace is a theme for lot 1
•	digital world is a theme for lot 2
•	The following themes will have to be meaningfully mainstreamed: gender, societal resilience and inclusion, providing innovative approaches.
All actions must conform to the above-described programme objectives and be directed towards the expected results and priorities identified for this CfP in section 1.2.
Location
Actions must take place in both the European Union and in Canada.
Types of action
The actions must contribute to the achievement of the objectives listed under section 1.2 of the present Guidelines (Objectives of the programme).
Actions should consist of a coherent set of activities with clearly defined operational objectives, target groups and planned, tangible outcomes, within a limited timeframe. The proposed actions should be designed to produce specific, measurable results in response to identified problems. Beneficiaries will be expected to measure the impact of their activities using tools and questionnaires provided by the Contracting Authority, including an audience engagement scorecard and in addition to narrative and financial reports under the PRAG.
Proposals must be based on concrete, recent and verifiable information that can clearly identify specific problems and the related constraints. It is thus necessary to set clear objectives based on specifically tailored strategies and intervention methodologies that incorporate complementary, consistent activities for tackling the identified problems directly. The means to be deployed should stem logically from this approach.
The following types of action are ineligible:
•	actions concerned only or mainly with individual sponsorships for participation in workshops, seminars, conferences and congresses;
•	actions concerned only or mainly with individual scholarships for studies or training courses;
•	construction or renovation of buildings or infrastructures;
•	actions that discriminate against specific individuals or groups of people on the basis of gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, political considerations or physical challenge(s).
Types of activity
The indicative list of activities undertaken in response to Lot 1, 2 and 3 may include:
•	Discussion/mapping of the challenges of the thematic priority addressed,
•	exchange of knowledge, experience, good practices in the area of the thematic priority addressed, through the organization of events/meetings, development of online platforms, etc.,
•	enhancement of cooperation and exchange of information by identifying the gaps and areas for improvement in the thematic priority addressed,
•	formulation of recommendations which would be disseminated as widely as possible in the EU and in Canada,
•	Smart and innovative social media solutions and campaigns on the thematic priority addressed.

Financial support to third parties 
Applicants may not propose financial support to third parties.
Visibility
The applicants must take all necessary steps to publicise the fact that the European Union has financed or co-financed the action. As far as possible, actions that are wholly or partially funded by the European Union must incorporate information and communication activities designed to raise the awareness of specific or general audiences of the reasons for the action and the EU support for the action in the country or region concerned, as well as the results and the impact of this support.
Applicants must comply with the objectives and priorities and guarantee the visibility of the EU financing (see the Communication and Visibility Manual for EU external actions specified and published by the European Commission at https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/communication-and-visibility-manual-eu-external-actions_en).
Number of applications and grants per applicants / affiliated entities
The lead applicant may submit more than one application per lot under this call for proposals.
The lead applicant may not be awarded more than one grant per lot under this call for proposals.
The lead applicant may not be a co-applicant or an affiliated entity in another application of the same lot at the same time.
A co-applicant/affiliated entity may submit more than one application per lot under this call for proposals.
A co-applicant/affiliated entity may not be awarded more than one grant per lot under this call for proposals.
A co-applicant/affiliated entity may not be the lead applicant or an affiliated entity in another application at the same time.
2.1.5	Eligibility of costs: costs that can be included 
Only ‘eligible costs’ can be covered by a grant. The categories of costs that are eligible and non-eligible are indicated below. The budget is both a cost estimate and an overall ceiling for ‘eligible costs’. 
The reimbursement of eligible costs may be based on any or a combination of the following forms:
•	actual costs incurred by the beneficiary(ies) and affiliated entity(ies)
•	one or more simplified cost options.
Simplified cost options may take the form of:
•	unit costs: covering all or certain specific categories of eligible costs which are clearly identified in advance by reference to an amount per unit.
•	lump sums: covering in global terms all or certain specific categories of eligible costs which are clearly identified in advance.
•	flat-rate financing: covering specific categories of eligible costs which are clearly identified in advance by applying a percentage fixed ex ante.
The amounts or rates have to be based on estimates using objective data such as statistical data or any other objective means or with reference to certified or auditable historical data of the applicants or the affiliated entity(ies). The methods used to determine the amounts or rates of unit costs, lump sums or flat-rates must comply with the criteria established in Annex K, and especially ensure that the costs correspond fairly to the actual costs incurred by the beneficiary(ies) and affiliated entity(ies), are in line with their accounting practices, no profit is made and the costs are not already covered by other sources of funding (no double funding). Refer to Annex K for directions and a checklist of controls to assess the minimum necessary conditions that provide reasonable assurance for the acceptance of the proposed amounts.
Applicants proposing this form of reimbursement, must clearly indicate in worksheet no.1 of Annex B, each heading/item  of eligible costs concerned by this type of financing, i.e. add the reference in capital letters to "UNIT COST" (per month/flight etc), "LUMPSUM" or "FLAT RATE" in the Unit column. (see example in Annex K)
Additionally in Annex B, in the second column of worksheet no.2, "Justification of the estimated costs" per each of the corresponding budget item or heading applicants must:
•	describe the information and methods used to establish the amounts of unit costs, lump sums and/or flat-rates, to which costs they refer, etc.
•	clearly explain the formulas for calculation of the final eligible amount
•	identify the beneficiary who will use the simplified cost option (in case of affiliated entity, specify first the beneficiary), in order to verify the maximum amount per each beneficiary (which includes if applicable simplified cost options of its affiliated entity(ies))
At contracting phase, the Contracting Authority decides whether to accept the proposed amounts or rates on the basis of the provisional budget submitted by the applicants, by analysing factual data of grants carried out by the applicants or of similar actions and by performing checks established by Annex K. 
The total amount of financing on the basis of simplified cost options that can be authorised by the Contracting Authority for any of the applicants individually (including simplified cost options proposed by their own affiliated entities) cannot exceed EUR 60 000 (the indirect costs are not taken into account). 
Recommendations to award a grant are always subject to the condition that the checks preceding the signing of the grant contract do not reveal problems requiring changes to the budget (such as arithmetical errors, inaccuracies, unrealistic costs and ineligible costs). The checks may give rise to requests for clarification and may lead the Contracting Authority to impose modifications or reductions to address such mistakes or inaccuracies. It is not possible to increase the grant or the percentage of EU co-financing as a result of these corrections.
It is therefore in the applicants' interest to provide a realistic and cost-effective budget.
The simplified cost option may also take the form of an apportionment of Field Office's costs.
Field Office means a local infrastructure set up in one of the countries where the action is implemented or a nearby country. (Where the action is implemented in several third countries there can be more than one Field Office). That may consist of costs for local office as well as human resources. 
A Field Office may be exclusively dedicated to the action financed (or co-financed) by the EU or may be used for other projects implemented in the partner country. When the Field Office is used for other projects, only the portion of capitalised and operating costs which corresponds to the duration of the action and the rate of actual use of the field office for the purpose of the action may be declared as eligible direct costs.
The portion of costs attributable to the action can be declared as actual costs or determined by the beneficiary(ies) on the basis of a simplified allocation method (apportionment).
The method of allocation has to be:
1. Compliant with the beneficiary's usual accounting and management practices and applied in a consistent manner regardless of the source of funding and 
2. Based on an objective, fair and reliable allocation keys. (Please refer to Annex K to have examples of acceptable allocation keys).
A description prepared by the entity of the allocation method used to determine Field Office's costs in accordance with the entity's usual cost accounting and management practices and explaining how the method satisfy condition 1 and 2 indicated above, has to be presented in a separate sheet and annexed to the Budget.
The method will be assessed and accepted by the evaluation committee and the Contracting Authority at contracting phase. The applicant is invited to submit (where relevant) the list of contracts to which the methodology proposed had been already applied and for which proper application was confirmed by an expenditure verification. 
At the time of carrying out the expenditure verifications, the auditors will check if the costs reported are compliant with the method described by the beneficiary(ies) and accepted by the Contracting Authority.
Adequate record and documentation must be kept by the beneficiary(ies) to prove the compliance of the simplified allocation method used with the conditions set out above. Upon request of the beneficiary(ies), this compliance can be assessed and approved ex-ante by an independent external auditor. In such a case, the simplified allocation method will be automatically accepted by the evaluation committee and it will not be challenged ex post.
When costs are declared on the basis of such allocation method the amount charged to the action is to be indicated in the column "TOTAL COSTS" and the mention "APPORTIONMENT" is to be indicated in the column "units" (under budget heading 1 (Human resources) and 4 (Local Office) of the Budget).

Eligible direct costs
To be eligible under this call for proposals, costs must comply with the provisions of Article 14 of the General Conditions to the standard grant contract (see Annex G of the guidelines).
Contingency reserve
The budget may include a contingency reserve not exceeding 5 % of the estimated direct eligible costs. It can only be used with the prior written authorisation of the Contracting Authority.
Eligible indirect costs
The indirect costs incurred in carrying out the action may be eligible for flat-rate funding, but the total must not exceed 7 % of the estimated total eligible direct costs. Indirect costs are eligible provided that they do not include costs assigned to another budget heading in the standard grant contract. The lead applicant may be asked to justify the percentage requested before the grant contract is signed. However, once the flat rate has been fixed in the Special Conditions of the grant contract, no supporting documents need to be provided.
If any of the applicants or affiliated entity(ies) is in receipt of an operating grant financed by the EU, it may not claim indirect costs on its incurred costs within the proposed budget for the action.
Contributions in kind
Contributions in kind mean the provision of goods or services to a beneficiaries or affiliated entities free of charge by a third party. As contributions in kind do not involve any expenditure for beneficiaries or affiliated entities, they are not eligible costs. 
Contributions in kind may not be treated as co-financing.
However, if the description of the action as proposed includes contributions in kind, the contributions have to be made.
Ineligible costs
The following costs are not eligible:
•	debts and debt service charges (interest);
•	provisions for losses or potential future liabilities;
•	costs declared by the beneficiary(ies) and financed by another action or work programme receiving a European Union (including through EDF) grant;
•	purchases of land or buildings, except where necessary for the direct implementation of the action, in which case ownership must be transferred, in accordance with Article 7.5 of the General Conditions of the standard grant contract, at the latest at the end of the action;
•	currency exchange losses;
•	credit to third parties;
•	salary costs of the personnel of national administrations.
2.2	
How to apply and the procedures to follow
To apply for this call for proposals, lead applicants need to:
I.	Provide information about the organisations involved in the action. Please note that the registration of this data in PADOR is obligatory for all lead applicants, co-applicant(s) and affiliated entitiy(ies).
PADOR is an on-line database in which organisations register and update information concerning their entity. Organisations registered in PADOR get a unique ID (EuropeAid ID), which they must mention in their application. PADOR is accessible via the website: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/pador_en.
II.	Provide information about the action in the documents listed under section 2.2.2. Online submission via PROSPECT is obligatory for this call.
It is strongly recommended to register in PADOR well in advance and not to wait until the last minute before the deadline to submit your application in PROSPECT. 
If it is impossible for the organisation to register online in PADOR for technical reasons, applicants and/or affiliated entity(ies) must complete the ‘PADOR off-line form attached to these guidelines. This form must be sent together with the application, by the submission deadline (see section 2.2.2.).
Before starting using PADOR and PROSPECT, please read the user guides available on the website. All technical questions related to the use of these systems should be addressed to the IT helpdesk at EuropeAid-IT-support@ec.europa.eu via the online support form in PROSPECT.
2.2.1	Application forms  
Applications must be submitted in accordance with the instructions on the grant application form annexed to these guidelines (Annexes A.1 and A.2). Applicants must apply in English or French.
Any error or major discrepancy related to the concept note or any major inconsistency in the application form (e.g. if the amounts in the budget worksheets are inconsistent) may lead to the rejection of the application.
Clarifications will only be requested when the information provided is not sufficient to conduct an objective assessment.
2.2.2	Where and how to send applications
Online submission:
Applications must be submitted online via PROSPECT https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/prospect following the instructions given in the PROSPECT user manual.
Upon submission of the application online, the lead applicant will receive an automatic confirmation of receipt in its PROSPECT profile. 
Please note that incomplete applications may be rejected. Lead applicants are advised to verify that their application is complete using the checklist (Annexes A.1 and A.2, Instructions).
2.2.3	Deadline for submission of applications
The deadline for the submission of applications is 10 July 2018 at 16:00 (Brussels date and time). In order to convert this deadline to local time you can use any online time converter tool that takes into account timezones and winter/summer time changes (example available here). Lead applicants are strongly advised not to wait until the last day to submit their applications, since heavy Internet traffic or a fault with the Internet connection (including electricity failure, etc.) could lead to difficulties in submission. The contacting authority cannot be held responsible for any delay due to such aforementioned difficulties.
Any application submitted after the deadline will be rejected.
2.2.4	Further information about applications 
An information session on this call for proposals will be held on 25 April 2018 at 14:00h. (Ottawa date and time) at the EU Delegation in Canada, 150 Metcalfe Street, 19th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Questions may be sent by e-mail no later than 21 days before the deadline for the submission of applications to the address(es) below, indicating clearly the reference of the call for proposals:
E-mail address: delegation-canada-pi@eeas.europa.eu
The Contracting Authority has no obligation to provide clarifications to questions received after this date.
Replies will be given no later than 11 days before the deadline for the submission of applications. 
To ensure equal treatment of applicants, the Contracting Authority cannot give a prior opinion on the eligibility of lead applicants, co-applicants, affiliated entity(ies), an action or specific activities.
No individual replies will be given to questions. All questions and answers as well as other important notices to applicants during the course of the evaluation procedure will be published on the EuropeAid website: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/online-services/index.cfm?do=publi.welcome. It is therefore advisable to consult the abovementioned website regularly in order to be informed of the questions and answers published.
All questions related to registration in PADOR or the online submission via PROSPECT should be addressed to the IT helpdesk at EuropeAid-IT-support@ec.europa.eu via the online support form in PROSPECT: Please note that the working languages of the IT support are English, French and Spanish. Therefore, users are invited to send their questions in those languages should they wish to benefit from an optimum response time.

2.3	Evaluation and selection of applications
Applications will be examined and evaluated by the contracting authority with the possible assistance of external assessors. All applications will be assessed according to the following steps and criteria.
If the examination of the application reveals that the proposed action does not meet the eligibility criteria stated in section 2.1, the application will be rejected on this sole basis.

STEP 1: OPENING & ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKS AND CONCEPT NOTE EVALUATION
During the opening and administrative check (including the eligibility check of the action), the following will be assessed:
•	If the deadline has been met. Otherwise, the application will be automatically rejected.
•	If the concept note satisfies all the criteria specified in the checklist in the instructions included in Annex A.1. This also includes an assessment of the eligibility of the action. If any of the requested information is missing or is incorrect, the application may be rejected on that sole basis and the application will not be evaluated further.
The concept notes that pass this check will be evaluated on the relevance and design of the proposed action.
The concept notes will receive an overall score out of 50 in line with the evaluation grid below. The evaluation will also check the compliance with the instructions on how to complete the concept note (Annex A.1).
The evaluation criteria are divided into headings and subheadings. Each subheading will be given a score between 1 and 5 as follows: 1 = very poor; 2 = poor; 3 = adequate; 4 = good; 5 = very good.
Evaluation Grid
Section	Maximum Score	
1. Relevance of the action	30	
1.1. How relevant is the proposal to the objectives and priorities of the Call for Proposals?*	5x2**	
1.2. How relevant to the particular needs and constraints of the target country(ies) or region(s) is the proposal (including synergy with other EU initiatives and avoidance of duplication)?*	5x2**	
1.3. How clearly defined and strategically chosen are those involved (final beneficiaries, target groups)? Have their needs been clearly defined and does the proposal address them appropriately?*	5	
1.4. Does the proposal contain specific added-value elements, such as environmental issues, promotion of gender equality and equal opportunities, needs of disabled people, rights of minorities and rights of indigenous peoples, or innovation and best practices [and the other additional elements indicated under 1.2. of these guidelines]?*	5	
2. Design of the action	20	
2.1. How coherent is the overall design of the action? In particular, does it reflect the analysis of the problems involved, take into account external factors and relevant stakeholders?	5x2**	
2.2. Is the action feasible and consistent in relation to the objectives and expected results?	5x2**	
Maximum total score	50	

* Note: A score of 5 (very good) will only be allocated if the proposal specifically addresses more than the required minimum number of priorities as indicated in section 1.2 (objectives of the programme) of these guidelines.
**these scores are multiplied by 2 because of their importance
Concept notes with a score lower than 30 will be rejected.
Concept notes that reach the above threshold will be ranked by score. The highest scoring applications will be pre-selected until the limit of at least 200% of the available budget for this call for proposals is reached. 
Lead applicants will receive a letter indicating the reference number of their application and the respective results. This letter will automatically appear online in the PROSPECT profile of the lead applicant.
The evaluation committee will then proceed with the lead applicants whose proposals have been pre-selected.

STEP 2: EVALUATION OF THE FULL APPLICATION 
Firstly, the following will be assessed:
•	If the full application form satisfies all the criteria specified in the checklist in Annex A.2. If any of the requested information is missing or is incorrect, the application may be rejected on that sole basis and the application will not be evaluated further.
The full applications that pass this check will be further evaluated on their quality, including the proposed budget and the capacity of the applicants and affiliated entity(ies). The evaluation criteria used are presented in the evaluation grid below. There are two types of evaluation criteria: selection and award criteria.
The selection criteria help to evaluate the applicant(s)'s and affiliated entity(ies)'s operational capacity and the lead applicant's financial capacity and are used to verify that they:
•	have stable and sufficient sources of finance to maintain their activity throughout the proposed action and, where appropriate, to participate in its funding (this only applies to lead applicants);
•	have the management capacity, professional competencies and qualifications required to successfully complete the proposed action. This applies to applicants and to any affiliated entity(ies).
For the purpose of the evaluation of the financial capacity, lead applicants must ensure that the relevant information and documents (i.e. accounts of the latest financial year and external audit report, where applicable) in their PADOR profile are up to date. If the information and documents in PADOR are outdated and do not allow for a proper evaluation of the financial capacity, the application may be rejected.
The award criteria help to evaluate the quality of the applications in relation to the objectives and priorities set forth in the guidelines, and to award grants to projects which maximise the overall effectiveness of the call for proposals. They help to select applications which the Contracting Authority can be confident will comply with its objectives and priorities. They cover the relevance of the action, its consistency with the objectives of the call for proposals, quality, expected impact, sustainability and cost-effectiveness.
The evaluation grid is divided into sections and subsections. Each subsection will be given a score between 1 and 5 as follows: 1 = very poor; 2 = poor; 3 = adequate; 4 = good; 5 = very good. 
Evaluation Grid
Section	Maximum Score	
1. Financial and operational capacity	20	
1.1. Do the applicants and, if applicable, their affiliated entity(ies) have sufficient experience of project management?	5	
1.2. Do the applicants and, if applicable, their affiliated entity(ies) have sufficient technical expertise (especially knowledge of the issues to be addressed)?	5	
1.3. Do the applicants and, if applicable, their affiliated entity(ies) have sufficient management capacity (including staff, equipment and ability to handle the budget for the action)?	5	
1.4. Does the lead applicant have stable and sufficient sources of finance?	5	
2. Relevance of the action	30	
2.1. How relevant is the proposal to the objectives and priorities of the Call for Proposals?	5x2**	
2.2. How relevant to the particular needs and constraints of the target country(ies) or region(s) is the proposal (including synergy with other EU initiatives and avoidance of duplication)?	5x2**	
2.3. How clearly defined and strategically chosen are those involved (final beneficiaries, target groups)? Have their needs been clearly defined and does the proposal address them appropriately?	5	
2.4. Does the proposal contain specific added-value elements, such as environmental issues, promotion of gender equality and equal opportunities, needs of disabled people, rights of minorities and rights of indigenous peoples, or innovation and best practices [and the other additional elements indicated under 1.2. of these guidelines]?	5	
3. Effectiveness and feasibility of the action	20	
3.1. Are the activities proposed appropriate, practical, and consistent with the objectives and expected results?	5	
3.2. Is the action plan clear and feasible?	5	
3.3. Does the proposal contain objectively verifiable indicators for the outcome of the action? Is any evaluation planned?	5	
3.4. Is the co-applicant(s)'s and affiliated entity(ies)'s level of involvement and participation in the action satisfactory?	5	

4. Sustainability of the action	15	
4.1. Is the action likely to have a tangible impact on its target groups?	5	
4.2. Is the proposal likely to have multiplier effects (including scope for replication, extension and information sharing)?	5	
4.3. Are the expected results of the proposed action sustainable?:(1) financially (how will the activities be financed after the funding ends?)(2) institutionally (will structures allowing the activities to continue be in place at the end of the action? Will there be local 'ownership' of the results of the action?)(3) at policy level (where applicable) (what will be the structural impact of the action — e.g. will it lead to improved legislation, codes of conduct, methods, etc?)(4) environmentally (if applicable) (will the action have a negative/positive environmental impact?)"	5	

5. Budget and cost-effectiveness of the action	15	
5.1. Are the activities appropriately reflected in the budget?	5	
5.2. Is the ratio between the estimated costs and the expected results satisfactory?	10	
Maximum total score	100	
If the total score for section 1 (financial and operational capacity) is less than 12 points, the application will be rejected. If the score for at least one of the subsections under section 1 is 1, the application will also be rejected.
If the lead applicant applies without co-applicants or affiliated entities the score for point 3.4 shall be 5 unless the involvement of co-applicants or affiliated entities is mandatory according to these guidelines for applicants.  
After the evaluation, applications will be ranked according to their score. The highest scoring applications will be provisionally selected until the available budget for this call for proposals is reached.
In addition, a reserve list will be drawn up following the same criteria. This list will be used if more funds become available during the validity period of the reserve list.

STEP 3: VERIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF THE APPLICANTS AND AFFILIATED ENTITY(IES)
The eligibility verification will be performed on the basis of the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority (see section 2.4). It will only be performed for the applications that have been provisionally selected according to their score and within the available budget for this call for proposals. 
•	The declaration by the lead applicant (Annex A.2, section 5) will be cross-checked with the supporting documents provided by the lead applicant. Any missing supporting document or any incoherence between the declaration by the lead applicant and the supporting documents may lead to the rejection of the application on that sole basis. 
•	The eligibility of applicants and the affiliated entity(ies) will be verified according to the criteria set out in sections 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3.
Any rejected application will be replaced by the next best placed application on the reserve list that falls within the available budget for this call for proposals. 

2.4	Submission of supporting documents for provisionally selected applications 
A lead applicant whose application has been provisionally selected or placed on the reserve list will be informed in writing by the Contracting Authority. It will be requested to supply the following documents in order to allow the Contracting Authority to verify the eligibility of the lead applicant, (if any) of the co-applicant(s) and (if any) of their affiliated entity(ies):
Supporting documents must be provided through PADOR (see section 2.2.)
1.	The statutes or articles of association of the lead applicant, (if any) of each co-applicant(s) and (if any) of each affiliated entity(ies). Where the Contracting Authority has recognised the lead applicant’s, or the co-applicant(s)’s, or their affiliated entity(ies)’s eligibility for another call for proposals under the same budget line within 2 years before the deadline for receipt of applications, it should be submitted, instead of the statutes or articles of association, a copy of the document proving their eligibility in a former call (e.g. a copy of the Special Conditions of a grant contract received during the reference period), unless a change in legal status has occurred in the meantime.  This obligation does not apply to international organisations which have signed a framework agreement with the European Commission.  
2.	An external audit report produced by an approved auditor, certifying the lead applicant's accounts for the last financial year available where the total amount of the requested EU contribution exceeds EUR 750 000. The external audit report is not required from (if any) the co-applicant(s)) or affiliated entity(ies)
This obligation does not apply to public bodies and international organisations provided that the international organisation in question offers the guarantees provided for in the applicable Financial Regulation, as described in chapter 6 of the Practical Guide.
This obligation does not apply to secondary and higher education establishments.
3.	Legal entity sheet (see Annex D of these guidelines) duly completed and signed by each of the applicants (i,e by the lead applicant and (if any) by each co-applicant(s), accompanied by the justifying documents requested there. If the applicants have already signed a contract with the Contracting Authority, instead of the legal entity sheet and supporting documents, the legal entity number may be provided, unless a change in legal status occurred in the meantime.
4.	A financial identification form of the lead applicant (not from co-applicant(s), nor from affiliated entity(ies)) conforming to the model attached at Annex E of these guidelines, certified by the bank to which the payments will be made. This bank should be located in the country where the lead applicant is established. If the lead applicant has already submitted a financial identification form in the past for a contract where the European Commission was in charge of the payments and intends to use the same bank account, a copy of the previous financial identification form may be provided instead.
5.	A copy of the lead applicant’s latest accounts (the profit and loss account and the balance sheet for the last financial year for which the accounts have been closed). A copy of the latest account is neither required from (if any) the co-applicant(s) nor from (if any) affiliated entity(ies);
6.	List of activities carried out in the field covered by the lot the application is made both in the EU and in Canada during at least the last three years at the time of the submission of the application.
The requested supporting documents (uploaded in PADOR or sent together with the PADOR offline form) must be supplied in the form of originals, photocopies or scanned versions (i.e. showing legible stamps, signatures and dates) of the said originals.
Where such documents are not in one of the official languages of the European Union, a translation into English or French of the relevant parts of these documents proving the lead applicant's and, where applicable, co-applicants' and affiliated entity(ies)' eligibility, must be attached for the purpose of analysing the application.
Where these documents are in an official language of the European Union other than English or French, it is strongly recommended, in order to facilitate the evaluation, to provide a translation of the relevant parts of the documents, proving the lead applicant's and, where applicable, co-applicants' and affiliated entity(ies)'  eligibility, into one of the languages of the call for proposals (English or French).
Applicants have to take into consideration the time necessary to obtain official documents from national competent authorities and to translate such documents in the authorised languages while registering their data in PADOR.
If the abovementioned supporting documents are not provided before the deadline indicated in the request for supporting documents sent to the lead applicant by the Contracting Authority, the application may be rejected.
After verifying the supporting documents, the evaluation committee will make a final recommendation to the Contracting Authority, which will decide on the award of grants.
NB :	In the eventuality that the Contracting Authority is not satisfied with the strength, solidity, and guarantee offered by the structural link between one of the applicants and its affiliated entity, it can require the submission of the missing documents allowing for its conversion into co-applicant. If all the missing documents for co-applicants are submitted, and provided all necessary eligibility criteria are fulfilled, the above mentioned entity becomes a co-applicant for all purposes. The lead applicant has to submit the application form revised accordingly.
2.5	Notification of the Contracting Authority’s decision
2.5.1	Content of the decision
The lead applicants will be informed in writing of the Contracting Authority’s decision concerning their application and, if rejected, the reasons for the negative decision. This letter will be sent by e-mail and will appear online automatically in the PROSPECT profile of the user who submitted the application. Lead applicants who, in exceptional cases (see section 2.2), had to submit their application by post or hand-delivery will be informed by e-mail or by post if they did not provide any e-mail address. Therefore, please check regularly your PROSPECT profile, taking into account the indicative timetable below.
An applicant believing that it has been harmed by an error or irregularity during the award process may lodge a complaint. See further section 2.4.15 of the Practical Guide. 
2.5.2	Indicative timetable 

	DATE	TIME	
1. Information meeting (if any)	25 April 2018	14:00h (Ottawa time)	
2. Deadline for requesting any clarifications from the Contracting Authority	19 June 2018	17:00h (Brussels time)	
3. Last date on which clarifications are issued by the Contracting Authority	29 June 2018	17:00h  (Brussels time)	
4. Deadline for submission of applications	10 July 2018	16:00h  (Brussels time)	
5. Information to lead applicants on opening, administrative checks and concept note evaluation  (Step 1)	August 2018*		
6. Information to lead applicants on the evaluation of the full application form (Step 2)	August 2018*	-	
7. Notification of award (after the eligibility check) (Step 3)	September 2018*	-	
8. Contract signature	 October 2018*	-	
*Provisional date. All times are in local time.
This indicative timetable refers to provisional dates (except for dates 2, 3 and 4) and may be updated by the Contracting Authority during the procedure. In such cases, the updated timetable will be published on the EuropeAid web site	 https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/online-services/index.cfm?do=publi.welcome.
2.6	Conditions for implementation after the Contracting Authority’s decision to award a grant
Following the decision to award a grant, the beneficiary(ies) will be offered a contract based on the standard grant contract (see Annex G of these guidelines). By signing the application form (Annexes A.1 and A.2 of these guidelines), the lead applicant agrees, if awarded a grant, to accept the contractual conditions of the standard grant contract. Where the Coordinator is an organisation whose pillars have been positively assessed, it will sign a PA Grant Agreement based on the PAGoDA template. In this case references to provisions of the standard grant contract and its annexes shall not apply. References in these guidelines to the Grant Contract shall be understood as references to the relevant provisions of the PA Grant Agreement.
Implementation contracts
Where implementation of the action requires the beneficiary(ies) and its affiliated entity(ies) (if any) to award procurement contracts, those contracts must be awarded in accordance with Annex IV to the standard grant contract.
2.7	Early detection and exclusion system (edes) 
The applicants and, if they are legal entities, the persons who have powers of representation, decision-making or control over them, are informed that, should they be in one of the situations mentioned in section 2.3.3.1 or 2.3.3.2 of the Practical Guide their personal details (name, given name (if natural person), address, legal form and name and given name of the persons with powers of representation, decision-making or control (if legal person)) may be registered in EDES. For further information see section 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 of the Practical Guide. 
3	
LIST OF annexes
Documents to be completed
Annex A:	Grant Application Form (Word format)
	A.1. Concept Note
	A.2. Full Application Form

Annex B:	Budget (Excel format)
Annex C:	Logical Framework (Word format)
Annex D:	Legal Entity Sheet
Annex E:	Financial identification form
Annex F:	PADOR offline Form (Only if impossible to register in PADOR)
DOCUMENTS FOR INFORMATION
Annex G:	Standard Grant Contract
-	Annex II:	general conditions 
-	Annex IV:	contract award rules
-	Annex V:	standard request for payment
-	Annex VI:	model narrative and financial report
- Annex VII:	model report of factual findings and terms of reference for an expenditure verification of an EU financed grant contract for external action
- Annex VIII:	model financial guarantee
- Annex IX: 	standard template for transfer of ownership of assets

Annex H:	Daily allowance rates (per diem), available at the following address: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/applicable-rates-diems-framework-ec-funded-external-aid-contracts-05072013_en
Annex J:	Information on the tax regime applicable to grant contracts signed under the call
Annex K:	Guidelines and Checklist for assessing Budget and Simplified cost options
Annex L :     e-learning : https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/prospect/external/
Annex M : user manual for PROSPECT : https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/prospect/external/

Useful links
Project Cycle Management Guidelines 
https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/aid-delivery-methods-project-cycle-management-guidelines-vol-1_en
The implementation of grant contracts - A Users' Guide
http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/companion/document.do?nodeNumber=19
Financial Toolkit	
http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/financial-management-toolkit-for-recipients-15112010_en.pdf
Please note: The toolkit is not part of the grant contract and has no legal value. It merely provides general guidance and may in some details differ from the signed grant contract. In order to ensure compliance with their contractual obligations, beneficiaries should not exclusively rely on the toolkit but always consult their individual contract documents.
* * *